|
|
|
(my PGP key, and you can get PGP from here)
![]() |
![]() |
Our studies show that globally, volcanoes on land and under the sea release a total of about 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually. ... while 200 million tonnes of CO2 is large, the global fossil fuel CO2 emissions for 2003 tipped the scales at 26.8 billion tonnes. Thus, not only does volcanic CO2 not dwarf that of human activity, it actually comprises less than 1 percent of that value.My emphasis. Volcanoes only produce "by far the greatest" amount of CO2 if your definition of "by far the greatest" includes "less than 130th as much as burning fossil fuels".
he claimed that CO2 levels are too negligible to cause warming, that water is a greater greenhouse glass and that in any case plants absorb excess CO2.Noooooo! This is sad in a way I can't properly describe... like finding out that David Attenborough is actually a creationist. Even worse, he started out the gig so well, "singing a song about John Dalton’s atomic theory in the style of George Formby". Now that is the Johnny Ball I remember and want more of!
An article published on the New Scientist’s website yesterday provides a wealth of scientific evidence against such claims. Ball also made some less decipherable comments that insects’ and spiders’ natural emissions were more damaging to the climate than fossil fuels.
A police force has defended spending £20,000 investigating a man's death after his ghost was said to have told psychics that gangsters had forced him to drink petrol and bleach. ... An inquest this week recorded a verdict of suicide after hearing there was no evidence of foul play. However the coroner, Peter Brunton, queried the murder inquiry held after mediums tipped off police, suggesting that the words "lion, a horse and a man called Tony Fox" were significant. "There was a great deal of communication between the mediums and the police," he said. "A great deal of effort was expended in following these leads up."I'm with Charlie Brooker on this subject:
When it comes to psychics, my stance is hardcore: they must die alone in windowless cells
Further to your email to David Tredinnick MP, following his Adjournment Debate, he has asked me to send you details of the book he used in researching the topic to which you referred.Very much so, thankyou. Now if only I could get my hands on a copy of this undoubtedly important tome of surgery and anatomy...
It is "Astrology and Compassion the Convenient Truth", by Roy Gillett, Kings Hart Books 2007, particularly paragraph 2, page 45.
I hope that is of assistance.
In a letter, the home secretary wrote: "I cannot have public confusion between scientific advice and policy and have therefore lost confidence in your ability to advise me as Chair of the ACMD."Of course one way of avoiding public confusion between scientific advice and policy would be to base policy on the evidence which the advisors give you. Another way which hadn't previously occurred to me is to ignore the evidence, then sack your advisor when they point out what you've done. One of these ways makes more sense than the other.
A conversion kit claiming to allow vehicles to run more efficiently using water does not work, a BBC investigation has discovered ... Its main component is a stainless steel vessel containing water and electrodes. It generates bubbles of oxygen and hydrogen gas by electrolysis, using an electrical current. The device is fitted under the bonnet of the car and draws its power from the car battery. The mixture of oxygen and hydrogen is piped into the air intake of the engine and is supposed to add to the conventional fuel.Which sounds clever but is nonsense and doesn't work. Best of all is the reaction of the man selling the thing, who has to be either delusional or a charlatan:
When confronted with the evidence, Steven Cordner of Hydro-Fuel Systems claimed the system worked but admitted he had no proof to show us. He said they had stopped selling the product.So it really really does work but you haven't got any evidence for this and you'll stop selling it. Riiight.
The Wellcome Collection has a couple of excellent 1890s adverts for implausible magnetic medical devices peddled by Mr Harness' Medical Battery Company. What's better is that PubMed has a copy of a British Medical Journal article from 1893 taking the Medical Battery Company to task in no uncertain terms:
THE MEDICAL BATTERY COMPANY, LIMITED, AND THE BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONIt's a great read, and all in moustache-quivering Victorian language. Long story short; the BMJ called Mr Harness out as a quack, he sued the BMJ, the BMJ stuck to their guns and the quack backed down. |
![]() |
![]() |
In 2001 I raised in the House the influence of the moon, on the basis of the evidence then that at certain phases of the moon there are more accidents. Surgeons will not operate because blood clotting is not effective and the police have to put more people on the street.I've e-mailed him to ask where he learnt that blood doesn't clot, and surgeons won't operate, at certain phases of the moon. I'm not being mean; this really has massive implications for public safety, first aid, medical practice and related fields. Or is utter bollocks. One of the two.
"It is a good system as it solves the problem of dealing with animal waste and it provides heat," said Mr Virta.Yup.
there is a theory that the emergence of the [HIV] virus in humans was itself caused by trials of the polio vaccine in Africa in the 1950sYes, there is such a theory, and it's right up there alongide its intellectual cousins such as "NASA faked the moon landings", "the government is spraying poisons disguised as aircraft vapour trails" and "the CIA hypnotised Elvis to shoot JFK".
Neil DeGrasse Tyson"Oh my", I thought. "Neil de Grasse Tyson? You mean the Neil de Grasse Tyson; astronomer, astrophysicist, planetarium director, explainer of strange things, all-round renaissance man and possibly the best candidate to inherit the mantle of Carl Sagan?" Why yes, exactly that Neil de Grasse Tyson.
Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was FakedBut not as funny as newspapers not realising that the Onion's a satire website, and reporting the story as fact:
Two Bangladeshi newspapers have apologised after publishing an article taken from a satirical US website which claimed the Moon landings were faked. ... Neither [the Daily Manab Zamin] nor the New Nation, which later picked up the story, realised the Onion was not a genuine news site. Both have now apologised to their readers for not checking the story. ...Whoops.